About Us

We must explain to you how all seds this mistakens idea off denouncing pleasures and praising pain was born and I will give you a completed accounts of the system and expound.

CONTACT US

Contact Info

123/A, Miranda City Likaoli Prikano, Dope United States

+0989 7876 9865 9

info@crtt.com

Computerized Revised Token Test Citations

Revised Token Test Articles

  • Arvedson, J.C., McNeil, M.R. & West, T. Prediction of Revised Token Test overall, subtest and linguistic unit scores by two shortened versions. Clinical Aphasiology. 57-63, 1986.
  • Campbell, T.F. & McNeil, M.R. Effects of presentation rate and divided attention on auditory comprehension in children with an acquired language disorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 26, 513-520, 1985.
  • Gallardo, G., Guardia, J., Villasenor, T. & McNeil, M.R. Psychometric data for the Revised Token Test in normally developing Mexican Children ages 4-12 years. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 26, 3, 225–234, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr018
  • Guardia, J., et al. An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Revised Token Test in Normally Developing Native Spanish Speaking Children. Sage Open, 1-20, 2014.
  • Hageman, C.F., McNeil, M.R., Rucci-Zimmer, S. & Cariski, D.M. Reliability of patterns of auditory processing deficits – Evidence from the Revised Token Test. Clinical Aphasiology. 12, 230-234, 1982.
  • Hula, W.D., Doyle, P.J., McNeil, M.R. & Mikolic, J.M. Rasch Modeling of Revised Token Test Performance: Validity and Sensitivity to Change. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 49, 27-46, 2006.
  • McNeil, M.R. “Aphasia:  Neurological Considerations.”  Topics in Language Disorders, 3, (4) 1‑19, 1983.
  • McNeil, M.R., Brauer, D. and Pratt, S.R. “A test of auditory language processing regression: Adult aphasia versus normal children ages 5-13 years.”  Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders. 18, 21-39, 1990.
  • McNeil, M.R., Dionigi, C.M., Langlois, A. and Prescott, T.E. “A Measure of Revised Token Test Ordinality and Intervality.” Aphasiology, 3, 1, 31-40, 1989.
  • McNeil, M.R. & Hageman, C.F. Auditory processing deficits in aphasia evidenced on the Revised Token Test:  Incidence and Prediction of across subtest and across item within subtest Patterns. Clinical Aphasiology. 9, 47-69, 1979.
  • McNeil, M.R., Odell, K.H. & Campbell, T.F. The Frequency and Amplitude of Fluctuating Auditory Processing in Aphasic and Nonaphasic Brain Damaged Persons.  Clinical Aphasiology, 12, 220-229, 1982.
  • McNeil, M.R. and Prescott, T.E. Revised Token Test.  Pro-Ed, Austin, 1978.
  • Odell, K.  “Comparisons between auditory and reading comprehension in Aphasic Adults.”  Master’s Thesis, University of Wisconsin – Madison. 1983.
  • Park, G., McNeil, M.R., & Tompkins, C. Reliability of the five-item Revised Token Test for individuals with aphasia.  Aphasiology, 14, 5/6, 527-535, 2000.
  • Quintana, M., Gonzalez, I.S., Gallardo, G. & McNeil, M.R. “An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Revised Token Test in Normally Developing Native Spanish Speaking Children”. Anuario de Psicologia/The UB Journal of Psychology.  45, 2, 147-160,

Computerized Revised Token Test Articles

  • Bakhtiar, M., Wong, M.N., Tsui, E.K.Y. & McNeil, M.R. Development of the English Listening and Reading Computerized Revised Token Test Into Cantonese – Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research. 63, 3743-3759, 2020.
  • Chen, S-H.K., McNeil, M.R., Hill, K., & Pratt, S.R. Translating and validating a Mandarin Chinese version of the Computerized Revised Token Test. Speech, Language and Hearing. 16, 1, 2013.
  • Eberwein, C.A., Pratt, S.R., McNeil, M.R., Fossett, T.R.D., Szuminsky, N.J., Doyle, P.J. Auditory performance characteristics of the Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT). Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 50, 865-877, 2007.
  • McNeil M.R., Kim A., Sung J.E., Pratt S.R., Szuminsky N., Doyle, P.J. 2009. Comparison of left versus right hand, and mouse versus touchscreen access   methods on the Computerized Revised Token Test. Paper presented at the 39th Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Keystone, CO. Abstract available from: http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00002085/
  • McNeil, M.R., Pratt, S.R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J.E., Fossett, T.R.D., Fassbinder, W. & Lim, K.Y. (2015). Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test:  Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1-14.
  • McNeil, M.R., Pratt, S.R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J.E., Fossett, T.R.D., Fassbinder, W. & Lim, K.Y. Online supplemental materials: Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 58(2) 311-324, doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0030.
  • Sung, J.E., McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S.R., Dickey, M.W., Fassbinder, W., Szuminsky, N.J., Kim, A. & Doyle, P. J. Real-time processing in reading sentence comprehension for normal adult individuals and persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 25: 1, 57-70, 2010.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687031003714434
  • Sung, J.E., McNeil, M.R., Pratt, S.R.  Working Memory and its relation to comprehension in native and nonnative speakers.  Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 13, 1, 41-50, 2010.
  • Sung, J.E., McNeil, M.R., Pratt, S.R., Dickey, M.W., Hula, W.D., Szuminsky, N.J., Doyle, P.J. Verbal Working Memory and its Relationship to Sentence-Level Reading and Listening Comprehension in Persons with Aphasia.  Aphasiology, 23, 7, 1040-1052, 2009.
  • Yoo, H., McNeil, M.R., Dickey, M.W. & Terhorst, L. Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing speed across age-matched normal healthy controls, left- hemisphere damage with, and without aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1853966