About Us

We must explain to you how all seds this mistakens idea off denouncing pleasures and praising pain was born and I will give you a completed accounts of the system and expound.

CONTACT US

Contact Info

123/A, Miranda City Likaoli Prikano, Dope United States

+0989 7876 9865 9

info@crtt.com

Test Languages

CRTT Language test versions currently in various stages of development

Farsi (Persian)

French

German

Greek

Hebrew

Hindi

Korean

Lebanese

Portuguese

Russian

*Spanish

**Turkish

 CRTT-R-wf-Active/Passive-English [McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky]

CRTT-L-Mandarin-Mainland China [McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Zhou]

CRTT-R-wf-Mandarin-Mainland China [McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Zhou]

*Gallardo, G.G., Guardia, J.G., Villasenor, T.V. & McNeil, M.R.  Psychometric data for the Revised Token Test in normally developing Mexican children ages 4-12 years. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (Advance Online Access published March 25, 2011)

*Quintana, M., Gonzalez, I.S., Gallardo, G. & McNeil, M.R. “An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Revised Token Test in Normally Developing Native Spanish Speaking Children”.  Anuario de Psicologia/The UB Journal of Psychology.  45, 2, 147-160, 2015.

**Turkyilmaz, D. & Belgin, E. Reliability, validity, and adaptation of Computerized Revised Token Test in Normal Subjects. International Advances in Otolaryngology.  8, 1, 103-112, 2012.

-All Published and tests currently in-development can be improved with additional data collaboration.  Individuals interested in collaboration on these or development of other language versions are encouraged to contact Dr. McNeil through this website or at mcneil@pitt.edu.

CRTT Languages Test Versions and Populations with Preliminary Data

American Sign Language (CRTT-ASL)

[Goldberg, Pratt & McNeil, Szuminsky]

*ASL Adult Hearing Proficient (N=15):

                CRTT-ASL-wf, Mean Score 13.73; Mean Efficiency Score 12.36 (Diff. = 1.47)

*ASL Adult Hearing Non-Proficient (N=15):

                CRTT-ASL-wf, Mean Score 13.63; Mean Efficiency Score 12.24  (Diff. = 1.39)

*ASL Adult Deaf Proficient (N=15):

                CRTT-ASL-wf, Mean Score 13.24; Mean Efficiency Score 11.60   (Diff. = 1.64)

**ASL Children (12.9 Yrs.) Deaf (N=3):

           CRTT-ASL-wf, Mean Score 11.51;  Mean Efficiency Score   9.27  (Diff. = 2.24)

American Sign Language Stroop (CRTT-ASL-Stroop)

[Goldberg, Pratt & McNeil, Szuminsky]

*ASL Adult Hearing Proficient (N=15):

           CRTT-ASL-wf-Stroop, Mean Score 13.94; Mean Efficiency Score 12.60  (Diff. = 1.34)

*ASL Adult Hearing Non-Proficient (N=15):

           CRTT-ASL-wf-Stroop, Mean Score 14.27; Mean Efficiency Score 12.94  (Diff. = 1.33)

*ASL Adult Deaf Proficient (N=15):

           CRTT-ASL-wf-Stroop, Mean Score 12.85; Mean Efficiency Score 11.37  (Diff. = 1.48)

Goldberg, E., Pratt, S.R., McNeil, M.R., Washington, S., DeHaan, K. & Shahen, M.  “Assessing the Reliability of the American Sign Language Version of the Computerized Revised Token Test”.  Paper presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Denver, CO, Nov. 2015.

*Goldberg, E., Pratt, S.R., & McNeil, M.R.  “Sentence Comprehension in Deaf and Hearing Signers in American Sign Language and Written English”.  Paper presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Philadelphia, PA, Nov. 2016.

*Goldberg, E  “Control of lexical inhibition in ASL and English-reading sentence comprehension in deaf and hearing ASL users” Master’s Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. 2017.

*Goldberg, E, Pratt, S.R & McNeil, M.R.  “Control of Lexical Inhibition in ASL & English-Reading Comprehension in Deaf & Hearing ASL Users”.  Paper presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Boston, Nov. 2018.

**Lacey, C.M. “Assessing the ASL and ASL–Stroop Versions of the Computerized Revised Token Test with Children.”  Bachelor of Philosophy Thesis. University of Pittsburgh. 2019.

CRTT-L English Test and Populations with Preliminary Data

CRTT-L-English

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky]

*/**Adult Healthy Control (N=34): Age 34-64

               Mean Score 14.10; Range 11.84-14.67; (SD. = 0.71):  **Cutoff Score =13.91;  (Cutoff Score =14.00 from 2022 ROC analyses);                          ***SEM = 0.20

               Mean Efficiency Score: 12.35; Range: 9.48-13.39; (SD. = 0.87); [Mean – Efficiency=1.75]

**Adult With Aphasia (N=103) Age 31-85:

               Mean Score: 11.83; Range: 7.79-13.77; (SD. =1.21):                                                                             SEM = 0.31

Mean Efficiency Score: 9.06; Range: 4.27-11.85; (SD. =1.50);     [Mean – Efficiency=2.77]

*Bryne, A. “Effects of age and hand preference on the CRTT-R-Word Fade” Master’s Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. 2017. 

*Hendricks, E. “Reaction time performance in healthy adults as an effect of age and hand preference on the CRTT-RT (sic POC) Battery.”  Master’s Thesis, 2017; University of Pittsburgh. 

*Brumbaugh, R.L. “Effects of aging and hand use on language comprehension using the computerized revised token test- reading-word fade and speed of processing battery”. B. Phil Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. 2019.

**Cutoff Score derived from 2SD below the control subject’s mean (McNeil, M.R., Pratt, S.R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J.E., Fossett, T.R.D., Fassbinder, W. & Lim, K.Y.  (2015). Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test:  Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1-14.

*** SEM = Standard Error of Measurement

CRTT-L-Cantonese and CRTT-R-wf-Cantonese Tests and Populations with Preliminary Data

CRTT-L-Cantonese

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Bakhtiar, Wong]

–Adult Healthy Control (N=42):

  Mean Score 13.70; Range 12.43-14.62  (SD. = .51):  [Mean – Efficiency= 1.19] **Cutoff Score = 13.75; ***SEM = .19

  Mean Efficiency Score 12.51; Range 11.32-13.99  (SD. = .65)                               Cutoff Score = 12.97

–Adult With Aphasia (N=32):

  Mean Score 11.48; Range 6.24-13.75  (SD. = 1.71):  [Mean – Efficiency= 1.43]                                           SEM = .29

  Mean Efficiency Score 10.05; Range 5.20-12.87  (SD. = 1.81)

CRTT-R-wf-Cantonese

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Wong, Bakhtiar]

–Adult Healthy Control (N=42):

  Mean Score 13.76; Range 12.38-14.89  (SD. = .65):  [Mean – Efficiency= 1.21]     Cutoff Score = 13.12;     SEM = .21

  Mean Efficiency Score 12.55; Range 10.29-14.16  (SD. = .92)                                Cutoff Score = 12.06

–Adult With Aphasia (N=32):

  Mean Score 11.60; Range 8.36-13.10  (SD. = 1.22):  [Mean – Efficiency= 1.61]                                             SEM = .60

  Mean Efficiency Score 9.99; Range 4.92-12.05  (SD. = 1.57)

CRTT-SOP-Cantonese

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Wong, Bakhtiar]

-Data collection in progress.

CRTT-L-English

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky]

–Adult Healthy Control (N=34): Age 34-64

  Mean Score 14.10; Range 11.84-14.67; (SD. = 0.71 ):  *Cutoff Score =13.91;                         ***SEM = 0.20

  Mean Efficiency Score: 12.35; Range: 9.48-13.39; (SD. = 0.87); [Mean – Efficiency=1.75]

–Adult With Aphasia (N=103) Age 31-85:

  Mean Score: 11.83; Range: 7.79-13.77; (SD. =1.21):                                                                    SEM = 0.31

  Mean Efficiency Score: 9.06; Range: 4.27-11.85; (SD. =1.50);     [Mean – Efficiency=2.77]

CRTT-R-wf-English

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky]

–*Adult Healthy Control (N=37) Age 34-64:

  Mean Score:14.34; Range: 12.43-14.89; (SD. = 0.49):     *Cutoff Score =13.25;                           SEM = 0.20

  Mean Efficiency Score: 12.85; Range: 10.55-13.80; (SD. = 0.84); [Mean – Efficiency=1.49]

–Adult With Aphasia (N=107) Age 31-85:

  Mean Score:12.28; Range: 8.57-14.42;   (SD. =1.42):                                                                    SEM = 024

  Mean Efficiency Score: 9.91; Range: 6.38-13.16; (SD. =1.64);      [Mean – Efficiency=2.37]

*Bryne, A. “Effects of age and hand preference on the CRTT-R-Word Fade” Master’s Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. 2017. 

*Hendricks, E. “Reaction time performance in healthy adults as an effect of age and hand preference on the CRTT-RT Battery.”  Master’s Thesis, 2017; University of Pittsburgh. 

*Brumbaugh, R.L. “Effects of aging and hand use on language comprehension using the computerized revised token test- reading-word fade and speed of processing battery”. B. Phil Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. 2019.

**Cutoff Score derived from 2SD below the control subject’s mean (McNeil, M.R., Pratt, S.R., Szuminsky, N., Sung, J.E., Fossett, T.R.D., Fassbinder, W. & Lim, K.Y.  (2015). Reliability and Validity of the Computerized Revised Token Test:  Comparison of Reading and Listening Versions in Persons With and Without Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1-14.

*** SEM = Standard Error of Measurement

 

 

 

CRTT-L-Mandarin-Taiwanese Test and Populations with Preliminary Data

CRTT-L-Mandarin-Taiwanese

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Chen]

–*Adult Healthy Control (N=19): Age Mean: 50.58; Range: 41-68

  Mean Score 13.54; (SD. = 0.59 )

  Mean Efficiency Score: 11.29; (SD. = 1.06); [Mean – Efficiency=2.25]

–Adult With Aphasia (N=11) Age Mean: 50.45; Range: 40-80

  Mean Score: 10.23; (SD. =0.89):

  Mean Efficiency Score: 7.19; (SD. =1.19);    [Mean – Efficiency=3.04]

Chen, S-H.K. “Translating and validating a Mandarin Chinese version of the Computerized Revised Token Test” Master’s Thesis, University of Pittsburgh,   2010.

Chen, S-H. K., Chen, M-C., Heilman, L. & McNeil, M.R. “Comparison of Access Modes Between English & Mandarin Speakers on the Computerized   Revised Token Test.”  Paper presented to the Annual Convention of the American Speech, Language, Hearing Association, Chicago, Nov.   2013.

Chen, S-H.K., McNeil, M.R., Hill, K., and Pratt, R.R. Translating and validating a Mandarin Chinese version of the Computerized Revised Token Test.   Speech, Language and Hearing. 16, 1, 2013.

CRTT-R-wf-Stroop Test with Preliminary Data

ØCRTT-R-wf-Stroop-English [McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky]

ØAdult With Aphasia(N=98/95):

Mean Score: 12.25; Range: 8.58-14.35; (SD. = 1.36):  [Mean – Efficiency = 3.13]

Mean Efficiency Score: 9.12; Range: 6.36-12.52;  (SD. = 1.12)

GOAL: Touch the token with the font color (green & red) and not the color word.

Touch the red circle and the black square.

CRTT Languages Test Versions and Populations with Preliminary Data

CRTT-R-wf-Subject/Object-English

[McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky, Fassbinder]

SUBJECT CLEFT: “It was the red square that touched the white circle for this one.”

OBJECT CLEFT:   “It was the red square that the white circle touched for this one.”

–Adult With Aphasia(N=90):

  Mean Score: 11.17; Range: 4.40-13.13; (SD. =1.22):  [Mean – Efficiency = 2.39]

  Mean Efficiency Score: 8.78; Range: 3.96-11.47; (SD. = 1.39)

CRTT-R-wf-Garden Path-English

[Fassbinder, McNeil, Pratt, Szuminsky]

GARDEN PATH: “Put the black square next to the blue square below the white circle for this one.”

GARDEN PATH CONTROL: “Put the blue circle that is right of the red circle below the green square for this one.”

GARDEN PATH FILLER: “Put the red square above the black circle for this one.”

–Adult With Aphasia(N=86):

  Mean Score: 10.10; Range: 8.30-12.16; (SD. = .74):   [Mean – Efficiency = 3.27]

  Mean Efficiency Score: 6.83; Range: 2.55-9.71;   (SD. = 1.34)